New Year’s Eve: A Good Swift Kick in the Year End

It’s the last day of 2025, and I’ll say it again–Worst. Year. Ever. At least for me.

That’s not to say that nothing good happened in my life this year: I’ve figured out how best to tell the story within my current novel; I’ve planned some of a novel series I want to write; I’ve added some new interests and goals to those already-rather-lengthy lists; I’ve reconnected with my family (though I still think the physical distance between me and them is a good thing)…actually, that’s about it.

On a lower note, I haven’t planned my finances very well, so I’ve obliterated my savings just to survive–and I’ve still had to hit a member of my family up for money so I can pay my rent for next month. I hope I can land paying employment next month, but my hopes are, right now, by no means high.

Looking at the situation, though, employment/finances are my only problem right now, though that does influence other aspects of my life, which are otherwise positive.

Admittedly, there are some things I could have done differently during the course of this year–though there is no way of knowing whether doing so would see me in a different, never mind better, place at this moment remains to be seen.

But I’m determined to do much, much better in 2026…come what may.

The Great Frustration/Biting Bullets

I don’t know how to begin this post, but I have no doubt the majority of people reading it will, to one degree or another, relate to it.

Since I got laid off last November, I’ve been navigating the job market, both solo and with the help of a government job-search agency; despite my best efforts and having an employment counsellor, it’s almost the end of the year and I still haven’t managed to find work; the situation is so bad I had to ask my mother for money so I could cover my rent for next month. I got lucky there; I don’t know how lucky I’ll be next month if I don’t find any paying employment by the end thereof. In any case, the experience of having to ask anyone for money is humiliating–my self-respect is six feet under right now.

I was on Employment Insurance, but that ended in July; the message I received from that agency had a tone of finality to it, making me feel like I couldn’t renew my claim. So, since the end of July, I’ve had to make two withdrawals from my Registered Retirement Saving Plan (RRSP) just to, you know, keep living. I can count on both of my hands the number of job interviews I’ve had, and those interviewers/employers who didn’t ghost me told me they had decided to go with another candidate. It’s difficult not to get discouraged under those circumstances. In fact, while I was out today to get some food, I felt suicidal, and I almost cried; the only thing(s) stopping me from taking my own life are my plans for next year–which involve livestreaming myself writing yet another draft of my current novel (mostly to prove that I’m the one writing it, and not using artificial intelligence–thus revealing my game plan), drawing more often than I do, resuming crocheting and knitting, getting back to cooking and baking…and landing a survival job, even if it’s part-time. And that’s just the tip of the iceberg.

But yeah, as dictated by capitalism, I spent the last couple of weeks feeling like complete crap–even though the world’s wealthiest people (among the most prevalent examples I can think of right now: Galen Weston, Elon Musk, Peter Thiel, and every big-name tech bro) are sitting on billions of dollars and not giving a damn about those of us on the bottom of the socioeconomic ladder struggling just to survive, thus they should be the ones feeling like complete crap.

Meanwhile, I have to figure out my financial situation going forward, especially if I don’t get paid employment.

That said, I will try to have myself a Merry little Christmas–and for those of you in the same, or a similar, boat, you do the same…but, if you feel you can’t, I, for one, will understand.

Verdict: 2025–Worst year ever.

Wicked: An Analysis

I’ve seen Wicked: For Good recently–and Wicked last year–and, like no doubt so many others, I have some thoughts.

In the original Wizard of Oz, the Wicked Witch of the West was just a straight-up villain–but that was in the days in which society at large saw only in terms of black and white when it comes to good and evil, and believed whatever the powers that be said. But in Wicked (inspired by the novel by Gregory Maguire), the Wicked Witch of the West, named Elphaba Thropp, has a sense of justice, evidenced chiefly through how she helps the speaking Animals (in one instance, she frees a lion cub from a cage), which contravenes the rule of the Wizard of Oz and those who enable him; the Wizard is a power-hungry ruler who has no problem harming or suppressing the innocent–case in point, the Animals–or lying to the people of Oz if it means he can keep his position, and Glinda (whose birth name is Galinda Upland), becomes the Wizard’s main propaganda tool, under the direct authority of (in Wicked: for Good) Press Secretary Madame Morrible–who, in one memorable scene from Wicked: For Good, tells Glinda to “Do what you do best–smile, wave, and shut up”; Glinda desires popularity, and actually has no innate magical power (it turns out the bubble she travels in–which the Wizard created–is a feat of engineering rather than magic), but ultimately she does actually have some good in her, as she welcomes the Animals back to Oz after the Wizard leaves with Dorothy and Toto (after she tells him to).

Given what I’ve seen in both Wicked movies, I’ve started thinking that the original Wizard of Oz story is, in and of itself–where Elphaba/the Wicked Witch of the West is concerned–a bit of propaganda (even if author L. Frank Baum didn’t intend for it to be so). And that’s the major message I’ve taken away from both Wicked movies–the dangers of buying into government or any other propaganda, especially if it’s invective against vulnerable populations, and that those in power will demonize anyone who goes against them if they can’t get them on their side. Elphaba tries to expose the Wizard of Oz as a fraud, but Madame Morrible, on behalf of the Wizard of Oz, thwarts her, while official propaganda slams her; when Elphaba goes into hiding, Madame Morrible tries to smoke her out by creating the cyclone that brings Dorothy and Toto to Oz and results in Nessarose’s death, then convinces the Wizard to see Dorothy, Toto, the Tin Man, the Scarecrow, and the Cowardly Lion, telling him that they are “visitors we can use.” In the first movie, Elphaba discovers the Wizard of Oz actually has no power and wants to use her and her magic to solidify his position; the Wizard himself admits it, and exposes his own modus operandi to both Elphaba and Glinda, and, in the second movie, tells Elphaba that people believe his and other lies because they want to, and that’s why Elphaba can never really expose him. Glinda tells her that the best way to get her message out is to get on the Wizard’s side, but Elphaba objects.

Then there’s the matter of Nessarose’s shoes. Nessarose receives them from her father, who has always adored her, and favoured her over Elphaba–I believe that’s because Nessa is actually his daughter, whereas Elphaba is the product of an extramarital affair on her mother’s part; regardless of the different ways Nessa’s father treats them, Elphaba is protective of Nessarose, even if she no doubt resents having to put Nessa’s needs and desires before her own, and at her own expense. When Dorothy’s house lands on Nessarose, killing her, Elphaba wants Nessa’s shoes because–in her words–they’re all she has of her. Glinda reveals her own tendency towards pettiness and spite when she responds to Elphaba calling her out for giving Nessa’s shoes to Dorothy, referring to Fiyero running away with Elphaba when he was going to marry Glinda; Glinda also reveals, in the first movie, that she can be obnoxious in certain situations, such as when she repeated corrects Dr. Dillamond’s pronunciation of her name (Dr. Dillamond is the one who first pronounced her name as ‘Glinda’).

Despite the fact that they’re supposed to be on opposite sides of the ledger–and they clash more often than not–Elphaba and Glinda still care about each other, even though Glinda still obfuscates when a Munchkin asks her if she and the Wicked Witch of the West were friends. Glinda, in both movies, is self-righteous, especially in her role as the Wizard of Oz’s propaganda tool, while Elphaba actually tries to bring justice to Oz, even as Oz’s mainstream press demonizes her and Madame Morrible proactively acts against her. Even so, Glinda achieves Elphaba’s aim of making Oz a place where all creatures can feel safe.

Ariana Grande-Butera perfectly portrays Glinda’s girlishness, self-righteousness, sweetness, and momentary pettiness and situational sweet obnoxiousness, and Cynthia Erivo effectively channels Elphaba’s sense of justice and feelings that come from being misunderstood and misrepresented (how appropriate that a black actress has been cast as Elphaba/The Wicked Witch of the West in this context). Jeff Goldblum is more than convincing as the Wizard of Oz–the carny and the politician, thus demonstrating the overlap between the two–and Michelle Yeoh is chilling as propagandist and witch Madame Morrible. The minor actors and extras are no less effective in displaying the outrage against Elphaba and demand for her life, and thus what they’ve been convinced is justice–and demonstrating how frightening a populace can be when it fully believes the lies those in power (especially when the people have no other source(s) of information at their disposal), and descends into mob mentality.

Wicked and Wicked: For Good demonstrate that it is possible to bring politics into a creative work and still tell a good story and be entertaining as well as informative–though I doubt the people who cry “leave politics out of it” will enjoy it very much, if at all. Writers Winnie Holzman, Dana Fox (first movie) Stephen Schwartz (second movie), and Gregory Maguire show, through their writing, their ability to simultaneously tell a compelling story and deliver an impactful message–and one relevant for our times.

Remembrance Day

It’s that time again–a time for ruling classes all over the white-dominated West to pay lip service to honouring the soldiers and veterans who have fought in wars perpetrated for their interests and glorify those wars. But it turns out–when you consider the conflicts the white-dominated West continues to get involved in and all of the shit going down in our own backyards–even after the determined promise after World War One of ‘Never again,’ humans as a species–especially those in society’s upper echelons–have learned absolutely nothing.

Let’s take stock:

Here in Canada, Indigenous rights still aren’t being respected, despite all of the talk about reconciliation and the fact that Canada has a Truth and Reconciliation Commission; Conservative Party leader Pierre Poilievre has made his own ‘criticisms’ (which are actually attacks) on the idea of diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) while crowing about the need for people to get ahead on their own merits (another post for another time); and Vancouver’s current mayor, Ken Sim, still believes that he can do whatever he wants and ignore any criticism or attempts to hold him accountable that come his way. Meanwhile, Alberta’s current premier, Danielle Smith, seems to be making a mess of that province, starting with the education system, and how the Government of Alberta is treating its teachers and students. None of these aforementioned points may have anything to do with Remembrance Day, but they’re actually starting points for so many problems that led to World War One in the first place–people feeling disenfranchised and powerless to determined their own destinies, thus leaving them vulnerable to any propaganda that, in the short term, makes them feel better.

In the United States, Donald Trump has won a second term as President, and he and his White House cadre are hell-bent on bringing to the U.S. the ‘divine right of kings,’ with Trump as absolute ruler…and U.S. citizens at all socioeconomic levels are either enabling or protesting him and the other thugs currently occupying the White House. Speaking of thugs, the verbalized purpose of the existence of the Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) is to curtail illegal immigration, but ICE agents have been indiscriminately rounding up anyone and everyone–regardless of citizenship and immigration status–who don’t even appear to be WASP–and commit other heinous acts. Bigotry–against race, religion, sexual orientation, gender identification, ability, etc.–is allowed to run rampant, and women are facing rollbacks against the rights they’ve gained within the last century. I know I’ve said this before, but the next President of the United States–provided the individual cares enough–is going to have one hell of a mess to clean up once they’re sworn into office.

Now we go onto the international stage–and I’ll start with the Israeli government vs. Palestine. The Israeli government, under Benjamin Netanyahu, is still determined to wipe what’s left of Palestine off the map–and the ruling classes of all Western nations insist on enabling them to do so. Greta Thunberg recently participated in a flotilla to bring aid to Gaza, and the Israeli government put her through hell for it; at the end of her ordeal, she stated there is a genocide happening in Gaza. For the last decade or so, Europe has seen a resurgence of racism–chiefly Islamophobia–and, in recent years, Russian President Vladimir Putin has started a conflict with Ukraine in an attempt to bring that nation under his control, while being a dictator to people in Russia. And I have a feeling I’m barely scratching the surface.

And yet, on this day, we’re all encouraged to pause and remember the sacrifices veterans have made, and soldiers make, for the ruling classes by fighting wars the ruling classes have started for their own profit, power, and prestige–while the rest of the year those same ruling classes treat soldiers, current, retired, and dead, like expendable pieces of meat. Stating the painfully obvious here, but the ruling classes will always do what’s in their own best interests–and paying lip service to honouring the veterans and soldiers who fight in wars that further those interests makes them look good…even while the world burns.

Bruce McAllister

I was scrolling on Threads today, and discovered a couple of posts including a video of an Alberta Next panel, in which moderator Bruce McAllister admonished seventeen-year-old high-school student Evan Li for asking questions about Alberta’s education system–namely, the province funding private schools and the upcoming teachers’ strike–then suggested his parents ‘turn him over their knee,’ after making comments about how Li was speaking and cutting his microphone mid-sentence.

This irritated me on so many levels.

First of all: a public figure and former politician–in public–advocating child abuse against a high-school student, and for saying something he didn’t like, and not in line with the United Conservative Party of Alberta‘s party line…I know I shouldn’t be surprised, but that a public figure would be so blatant, and in public, about advocating corporal punishment/child abuse…all I can say is, McAllister and Alberta’s UPC have nothing to be proud of here.

McAllister also had the temerity to tell Li that he wasn’t ‘making sense.’ Maybe not to McAllister; however, I thought Li made perfect sense in asking about the state of Alberta’s education system, at present and going forward. As far as I’m concerned, McAllister’s response is just another instance of adults finding ways to not listen to children and youth and take them, their issues, and their concerns seriously, even if said issues and concerns apply to society at large.

I’d also like to point out the complete condescension and disingenuity of McAllister saying he “applauded” Li’s coming to the event to speak, but didn’t like the way he was speaking…

But I can’t say I’m surprised or shocked to see the arrogance of someone from Canada’s Conservative Party–or anyone adjacent to it–on such open, blatant display; these people clearly think that they can get away with anything and everything.

But I have to give the people in the audience kudos for supporting Li, especially after McAllister stated his parents ought to turn him over their knee; I heard a female voice, speaking into the microphone, that what McAllister did and said to Li was ‘rude’ (more than once) and ‘disgraceful,’ accompanied by a chorus of ‘boos’ from the general audience. And I have to at least nod my acknowledgment to everyone in Internet comments sections who praised Li for speaking truth to power, and decried the way McAllister treated him. And Li himself deserves some praise for the way he handled his mistreatment, and for speaking out after the fact, and continuing to speak up for teachers, students, and others in Alberta who are negatively affected by the decisions of Alberta’s provincial government. Like so many have stated, Li and his actions are a light in the darkness of our times.

I don’t live in Alberta, but McAllister’s treatment of Li in that joke of a ‘town hall’ really sticks in my craw, and I hope he faces severe consequences for it; I know Danielle Smith won’t dismiss him from his position, but I hope the good people of Alberta will continue to hold McAllister to account for his atrocious behaviour towards Li.

I know this post is more than a tad disjointed, but it’s urgent, and I need to get my views on this situation out there.

Peter Thiel

“The urge to save humanity is almost always a false front for the urge to rule it.” — H.L. Mencken

‘But as sure as God made black and white/What’s done in the dark will be brought to the light’–Johnny Cash, ‘God’s Gonna Cut You Down,’ American V: A Hundred Highways, 2006

While the world pays attention to the current Jackass in Chief Donald Trump and his crony Elon Musk and his toadies and their headline-grabbing antics (especially Trump’s), a shadowy figure works behind the scenes to ensure that nothing can stop their reign of terror, nor contain it within the borders of the United States of America. That individual, ladies and gentleman, boys and girls, trans, non-binaries, and intersex folks, and everyone else on the gender spectrum, is PayPal founder and tech bro Peter Thiel.

Thanks to a recent YouTube short, I’ve learned about a speech Thiel made, in which he vocalized his dream that “you could unilaterally change the world without having to constantly convince people and beg people and plead with people who are never going to agree with you through technological means” (in other words, he wants to use technology to bypass democratic processes and dominate society), calling technology an “incredible alternative to politics”–which it shouldn’t be; rather, technology should work with politics, and emphasize and respect human rights. But, then again, Thiel and his family lived in South Africa–in which he lived in a community ‘known at the time for its continued glorification of Nazism’– and modern-day Namibia in the time of apartheid, so I’m not surprised that he wants to do away with democracy and turn the world into a right-wing fascist dictatorship, as evidenced by his co-founding of the organization named Palantir. A self-proclaimed conservative libertarian, Thiel has ‘made substantial donations to American right-wing figures and causes,’ along with helping Hulk Hogan fund his lawsuit against Gawker (the documentary about the case, ‘Nobody Speak: Trials of the Free Press,’ is on Netflix).’ Now, I realize Thiel could have changed his politics and worldview, but he chose not to; I believe that’s because he benefits from the worldview he did adopt–namely, that technology should replace, rather than be used in conjunction with, politics, especially if it’s used to push the agendas of the rich and powerful.

Just when I couldn’t be more frightened for my neighbours in the United States–especially those not in the ruling class–or the world…

Peter Thiel has long operated in the shadows. Now it’s time to bring his dastardly deeds–and beliefs–into the light…especially given the danger they pose to the world, democracy, and human rights.

Sources:

https://www.techpolicy.press/when-we-are-no-longer-needed-emerging-elites-tech-trillionaires-and-the-decline-of-democracy/

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Peter_Thiel

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=s-BQhXdCs8Y

https://www.advocate.com/peter-thiel/peter-thiel-model-jeff-thomas

https://theconversation.com/when-the-government-can-see-everything-how-one-company-palantir-is-mapping-the-nations-data-263178

‘Illegal Aliens’

Thanks to YouTube–and its airing of an advertisement telling so-called ‘illegal aliens’ that ‘their time is up’ or some such garbage (voiceover by United States Secretary of Homeland Security Kristi Noem)–I have now found the wherewithal to comment on the issue.

First of all, I’m going to echo what so many commenting on the issue of immigration have said for as long as I can remember: The Native Americans/American Indians/Indigenous people never asked the pilgrims/Puritans for their documents when they disembarked The Mayflower. I’m fairly certain my English and French ancestors didn’t have to show the Indigenous people here in North America their documents when they arrived; in fact, I’m fairly certain they didn’t even have documents–they just landed. I am sick to the back teeth of white people grumbling about ‘immigrants’ coming to ‘their land’ and ‘taking what’s theirs’–never mind that people (chiefly men) from England, France, Spain, and the Netherlands (that I know of) stole land from Indigenous peoples here and herded those they couldn’t kill into ghetto conditions–euphemistically calling such places ‘reserves’ or ‘reservations’–outlawed their traditional practices, and forced their children into residential or industrial schools to strip them of their cultures, punish them for speaking their native languages–and forcing the European languages (chiefly English) on them–and in all ways abuse and humiliate them and rob them of their humanity (‘kill the Indian to save the man’ or something to that effect ); the hypocrisy of any and all rhetoric about ‘illegal aliens’ is just boggling to me–and I don’t know if should be surprised that said hypocrisy is lost on those who spout it. For those of you who cry that immigrants–documented or not–are coming into ‘your’ country and taking everything that you claim is yours: Are they forcing you into ghettos? Outlawing your traditional practices and way of life, and forcing theirs onto you? Taking your children away from you and forcing their cultures and ways of life on them, while punishing yours and dehumanizing them? Forcing their languages onto you while forbidding you from speaking yours? No? Then do us all a favour and zip-it.com. I’d also like to take this moment to point that American–and possibly international–history’s first ‘anchor baby’ is Virginia Dare.

I get the feeling that immigration laws–here in Canada and in the United States–skew white and wealthy in terms of who’s allowed in, and under the so-called ‘right’ circumstances–and the ‘documents’ requirement is just another manifestation of white supremacy, and the moaning and wailing about “illegal aliens” has a bent of white fragility to it.

There’s also a scapegoat notion to the issue of ‘illegal aliens’ (and immigrants in general). For as long as I can remember, white people (including quite a few I’ve known) have blamed immigrants–documented or not–for all of our failures in life, instead of taking even one iota of personal responsibility (the irony being that so many in this camp are no doubt also personal-responsibility apologists…or at least buy into personal-responsibility rhetoric).

Another bit of hypocrisy and irony I would like to address is that families of immigrants who Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) is ‘arresting and detaining’ are being separated. To the ‘family values’ crowd, I have to ask: What ‘family values’ are you espousing? Just because the families ICE is fracturing aren’t white doesn’t mean they’re not families and they don’t need to be kept together–especially if they’re not actually doing anything wrong.

But the cognitive dissonance of conservatives and reactionaries sometime boggles me, and always gets under my skin.

I would like to add that Kristi Noem deserves what Trey Parker and Matt Stone (also known as ‘the South Park’ guys) did to her–and she should consider herself lucky if that’s the worst thing to ever happen to her.

The moral of the story: America–hell, the world–is a place of immigrants, and has a history of immigration, human settlement, and conquest, and there’s nothing any of us can do to stop it, regardless of our individual positions in society–and no amount of demonizing people who immigrate to one country or another will change that, ergo any notion that we can prevent immigration anywhere is pure delusion. No one owns any of Planet Earth’s land, nor the nations that occupy it, so we can either accept immigration and new people coming to the places where we live and settling down, or we can whine about it and make the lives of the newcomers a living hell–or at least uncomfortable. I prefer to do the former–at the barest minimum, doing the former makes me look like at least a semi-decent person.

The Cultural Sector, Capitalism, and Generative AI

Some time while I was writing my previous post about capitalism and the cultural sector, I started thinking about Max Horkheimer and Theodor Adorno and their commentary about what they called the ‘culture industry,’ and how the advent of generative artificial intelligence fits into the discussion.

Horkheimer and Adorno coined the term ‘culture industry’ to describe the standardization of works of art, literature, music, etc., and likened it to a factory mass-producing products, designed to pacify and control populations under capitalism, leading to standardization, manipulation, the manufacture of false needs, and the commodification of culture, the consequences of which–for individuals and society–include ‘the suppression of individuality, the devaluation of genuine art, and the perpetuation of social inequalities.’ Adorno and Horkheimer contend that ‘industrially-produced culture robs people of their imagination and does their thinking for them,’ leaving people to merely consume art and culture–and passively.

And that was before the advent of artificial intelligence–of any kind.

The aims of the culture industry are–as in every industry–economic in nature. And with generative AI–especially when it comes to art and other creative pursuits–it’s all about the money. AI doesn’t care about quality, and, unlike humans, anything run by AI can’t put its own individual ‘spin’ on ideas and influences; because AI runs machines, all it can do is what people program it to do. At its best, generative AI perpetuates industrially-produced culture.

For me, in terms of use of AI, the problem is the same one I have with the culture-industrial complex in general and, well, just in general: corporate interests–in this scenario, corporate interests ushering in generative and other kinds of AI without doing a cost-benefit analysis–and because corporations want to get products and services to the public in the shortest amount of time possible. And that’s the problem with the culture industry–any work of art is just another product to be bought and sold.

That’s not to say artists don’t like being paid for the work they do, but money isn’t the end-all be-all for us; the truth is, art–real art–is one way humans engage with the world. And the latter point is one point (out of many) I believe Horkheimer and Adorno were trying to make when they criticized the culture industry.

However, at this juncture, it seems the artificial-intelligence horse has bolted–thanks especially to corporate interests–and now artists and others who see the dangers of unregulated AI are scrambling to shut the stable door. Of course, it doesn’t help that governments–especially those in developed, industrialized nations–have corporate sponsors, so of course regulation, if it exists, is lacklustre at best, and prioritizes corporate interests over human rights. And yes, people freely consuming AI ‘art’ contributes to the problem, but that is more a problem of the system–a system which, among other things, makes real art inaccessible to the masses…or at least less accessible to the masses than to the upper echelons of society. Yes, individual choices can make a difference, but let’s not hyperfocus on that–especially to the point that it relieves the most powerful segments of society (read: governments and corporations) of even the tiniest semblance of responsibility.

But AI ‘art’ just drives home what Max Horkheimer and Theodor Adorno said about, and perpetuates, the culture industry, while threatening the livelihoods of real artists and further leading to the devaluation of genuine art and the pacification of the masses and enriching corporations and other opportunists. In short, AI ‘art’ is just art produced (not even) in a factory, created with no talent, skill, or work (since a lot of AI ‘art’ is actually plagiarized), a product with no depth or meaning.

Sources:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Culture_industry

My previously-expressed thoughts on artificial intelligence:

https://www.buzzsprout.com/admin/46823/episodes/17534735-ai-slop-money-for-nothing

Capitalism and the Culture-Industrial Complex

An off-topic comment on my previous post–which was my personal memorial to the late and woefully-underrated George Kooymans (Rust in vrede, Meneer Kooymans)–inspired me to write this piece about what Theodor Adorno and Max Horkheimer called the culture industry. The comment I’m alluding to was about ‘musicians’ (all of them pushed by the recording industry and its gatekeepers), but I’m also going to talk about all aspects of the culture industry and cultural sector, with my personal focus being on the film and publishing industries as well as the music industry.

Nowadays–with very few exceptions–a lot, if not most, of what we hear on the radio, see on TV and in movie theatres, and quite possibly on mainstream-bookstore shelves–is (and I’m going to be impolite here) crap–crap that managed to get approved by the gatekeepers and financed by studios and publishing houses (especially the Big Five), simply because the head honchos in those establishments know it will make money, and they don’t want to deviate from that and chance distributing work that will cost them money without making any of it back–or at least making less money than they spent.

Now, I’m not saying that everything produced from the 1950s to the 1990s ( and earlier) was good–there was a lot of crap produced it those days, too; for instance, ‘boy’ bands, namely those in the late 1980s and late 1990s–Vanilla Ice and the Spice Girls weren’t all that great, either; however, before the turn of the millennium, artists have had to work at their craft, regardless of the technology available to them during the respective periods of history they lived in (in the periods before Autotune existed, anyway), and, if they had no artistic talent or nobody supported their work, they had to do something else. I will acknowledge that there were hacks and plagiarists in all periods of history, but, for real artists, money wasn’t the sole driver (and still isn’t). And that’s not even getting into generative artificial intelligence (another post for another time…and I’ve expressed my thoughts on this subject elsewhere–and I can’t believe I may have more thoughts on this subject).

But we do live in under the economic system that is capitalism–and, under that economic system, visual art, music, books, film and television shows, and other works of art are, like almost everything else under said system, merely products to be bought and sold on what is (laughably) called the free market.

In this day and age, the words of Adorno and Horkheimer, unfortunately, turned out to be eerily prophetic. What’s on the radio outside of classic-rock stations all sounds the same–pop ‘acts’ are indistinguishable from each other, to the point of being interchangeable (again, with few exceptions); only on the odd occasion is the world–accidentally–exposed to an actual musician or band who’s released something good into the world (case in point: Ghost Hounds and their song, ‘Last Train to Nowhere’). The last time I went to the cinema to watch a movie was when I went to see the screen adaptation of Wicked–and I can’t remember when that was–and I haven’t been back to the movie theatre since, simply because most of the movies being advertised nowadays aren’t worth the money or the energy I’d spend going out to see them, regardless of any Scene points I’d get for doing so. As for books…well, I’ll admit I’m often tempted to purchase a lot of the books I see on the shelves, regardless of their genre, but a huge part of me wonders if any of those books are worth their asking price…in which case, I’m grateful public libraries aren’t, as of yet, defunct.

But, going back to my point–if we want to watch, listen to, or read anything worth anything, for the most part, we have to work for it now (if we don’t stumble upon it), since a lot of what the mainstream free market is selling us now is somewhere between dreck and shlock. I don’t mean to sound like a baby boomer in making this pronouncement–I’m actually a Generation Xer (I may even be what’s known as an Xennial)–but I want whatever I pay to listen to, watch, and read to be worth the asking price. I understand that taste is subjective, but corporate entities have interfered for far too long in the advertising, marketing, and distribution of the products of the cultural sector.

And that’s the problem with works of art (particularly music, film/television, and, to a lesser extent, books) we’re being sold in this day and age, especially in the mainstream: corporate interests. A lot of the music, movies, television shows, and books being presented to us nowadays are marketing decisions made by faceless corporations whose chief, if not sole, interest is making money. Within the last decade or so, I’ve heard voices crying for people to support independent music, film, and book publishers and stores, but, the economy being what it is, that’s always been difficult, and is getting increasingly so, especially for those folks who have limited income (for the most part).

Sorry for the stream-of-consciousness Boomer-esque rant, but I just believe that we, as a society need to expect more and better when it comes to works of any kind of art–and make it accessible to everyone.

In Memoriam: George Kooymans

I found out this week that Golden Earring co-founder/guitarist/vocalist/composer George Kooymans died last week after battling ALS (or Lou Gehrig’s disease) for the last four years, so I’m tardy to the memorial, but now I feel compelled to say something about this turn of events–even if it’s in a stream-of-consciousness kind of way.

Like so many on the American side of the Atlantic, I’ve (close to) always been familiar with Golden Earring’s songs ‘Radar Love’ (Moontan, 1973) and ‘Twilight Zone’ (Cut, 1982), but, after hearing more of their oeuvre (I have their self-titled album–in its entirety–and a lot of their other songs on my iPod; in fact, Golden Earring songs take up a considerable amount of space thereon), I’ve come to appreciate their talent and how far it goes–even more so after seeing videos online of their performances. I’ll be honest: when watching those videos, I’ve paid extremely close attention to Kooymans’ guitar work, which was…the only word I can think of to describe it is phenomenal; I would like to add that Kooymans’ falsetto from early in his career would have blown Jordan Knight out of the water. I’m not a musician, and haven’t had any formal training in music, so I don’t know all of the mechanics, ins and outs, odds and ends, bits and bobs, etc., but the way the members of Golden Earring worked together…the sounds they produced individually blended so well, and what I’ve heard of their music…it just works, and I like the way most of their songs sound. They have become quite the cultural phenomenon in Europe–particularly in their native Netherlands–but I can just imagine what would have happened if they had gotten more of a foothold on this side of the Atlantic, but they do have what can only be described as a cult following in Anglo-America, so…

I’ve read some thinkpieces online this week which have talked about Kooymans’ life and career; the Google search link to one of them called Kooymans ‘the brain and the soul (translated from Dutch, ‘het brein en de ziel’) of Golden Earring,’ and a small paragraph from this piece described him as essentially the glue that held the band together–especially the current lineup of himself, bassist/keyboard player Rinus Gerritsen, vocalist/guitarist/flautist Barry Hay, and drummer Cesar Zuiderwijk–who’ve been together in that particular setup since the early 1970s.

For me–since I can (unfortunately) measure the last time I listened to Golden Earring in years (unless you count last night, when I watched videoclips of a couple of their songs online)–George Kooymans’ death is yet another example, and more proof, that you don’t know what you’ve got until it’s gone.

Despite that, I just want to be one more voice in the world that thanks George Kooymans and Golden Earring for the awesome music and recorded performances, and leaving such a mark on the world.

Rust In Vrede (Rest In Peace), George Kooymans (1948-2025)